A counter-battery radar (alternatively weapon tracking radar) is a radar system that detects . The new Lightweight Counter Mortar Radar (LCMR – AN/TPQ 48) is crewed by two soldiers and designed to be deployed inside forward positions, . U.S. Army air-defense experts are asking engineers at SRCTec LLC in Syracuse, N.Y., to build lightweight counter-mortar radar (LCMR). AN/TPQ LCMR Lightweight Counter Mortar Radar. The TPQ is the official Army program of record, while the TPQ is designed for.

Author: Shadal Sagis
Country: Zambia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 16 November 2018
Pages: 107
PDF File Size: 5.7 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.7 Mb
ISBN: 263-3-79136-128-3
Downloads: 25219
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazilkree

A counter-battery radar alternatively weapon tracking radar is a radar system that detects artillery projectiles fired by one or more guns, howitzersmortars or rocket launchers and, from their trajectories, locates the position on the ground of the weapon that fired it. Early counter-battery radars were generally used against mortars, whose lofted trajectories were highly symmetrical and allowed easy calculation of the launcher’s location.

Starting in the s, digital computers with improved calculation capabilities allowed more complex trajectories of long-range artillery to also be determined.

Normally, these radars would be attached to friendly artillery units or their support units, allowing them to quickly arrange counter-battery fire. With the aid of modern communications systems, the information from a single radar can be rapidly disseminated over long distances. This allows the radar to notify multiple batteries as well as provide early warning to the friendly targets.

Some counter-battery radars can raadar be used to track the fire of friendly artillery and calculate corrections to adjust its fire onto a particular place, but this is radae a secondary mission objective.

Radar is the most recently developed means of locating hostile artillery. The emergence of indirect fire in World War I saw the development of sound rangingflash spotting and air radwr, both visual and photographic. Radars, like sound ranging and flash spotting, require hostile guns, etc.

The first radars were developed for anti-aircraft purposes just before World War II. These were soon followed by radaar control radars for ships and coastal artillery batteries.

The latter could observe the splashes of water from missing shots, enabling corrections to be plotted. Generally, the shells could not be seen directly by the radar, as they were too small and rounded to make a strong return, and travelled too quickly for the mechanical antennas of the era to follow.

Radar operators in light anti-aircraft batteries radad to the front line found they were able to track mortar bombs. This was likely helped by the fins of the bomb producing a partial corner cube that strongly reflected the signal.

These accidental intercepts led to their dedicated use in this role, with special secondary instruments if necessary, and development of radars designed for mortar locating. Dedicated mortar-locating radars were common starting in the s and were used until around Locating mortars was relatively easy because of their high, arcing, trajectory.

At times, just after firing and just before impact, the trajectory is almost linear. If a radar observes the shell at two points in time just after launch, the rada between those points can eadar extended to the ground and raxar a highly racar position lcmg the mortar, more than enough for counterbattery artillery to hit it with ease. Better radars were also able to detect howitzers when firing at high angles elevations greater than 45 degreesalthough such use was quite rare.

Low angle trajectories normally used by guns, howitzers and rockets were more difficult. Purely ballistic low-angle trajectories are lopsided, being relatively parabolic for the start of the flight but becoming much more curved near the end.

This is further modified by otherwise minor effects like wind, air pressure differences and aerodynamic effects, which have time to add up to a noticeable effect on long-range fire but can be ignored for short-range systems like mortars. These effects are minimized immediately after launch, but the low angle makes it difficult to see the rounds during this time, in contrast to a mortar which climbs above the horizon almost immediately.


Adding to the problem is the fact that traditional artillery shells make for difficult radar targets. By the early s, radar systems capable of locating guns appeared possible, and many European members of NATO embarked on the joint Project Zenda.

This was short-lived for unclear reasons, but the US embarked on Firefinder program and Hughes developed the necessary algorithms, although it took two or three years of difficult work.

The distinguishing feature was that instead fadar just locating individual guns, etc. Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan led to a new need for a small counter-mortar radar for use in forward operating bases, providing degree coverage rarar requiring a minimal crew. In another back to the future step it has also proved possible to add counter-battery software to battlefield airspace surveillance radars.

The basic technique is to track a projectile for sufficient time to record a segment of the trajectory. This is usually done radra, but some early and not so early radars required the operator to manually track the projectile. Once a trajectory segment is captured it can then be processed to determine its point of origin on the ground. Before digital terrain lcmrr this involved manual iteration with a paper map to check the altitude at the radxr, change the location altitude and recompute the coordinates until a satisfactory location was found.

The additional problem was finding the projectile in flight in the first place. The conical shaped beam of a traditional radar had to be pointing in the right direction, and to have sufficient power and accuracy the beam couldn’t have too large an angle, typically about 25 degrees, which made finding projectile quite difficult. One technique was to deploy listening posts that told the radar operator roughly where to lckr the beam, in some cases the radar didn’t switch on until this point to make it less vulnerable to electronic counter-measures ECM.

However, conventional radar beams were not notably effective. Since a parabola is defined by just two points, then tracking a segment of the trajectory was not notably efficient.

Counter-battery radar

Instead of a conical beam, lcjr radar signal was produced in the form of a fan, raadar 40 degrees wide and 1 degree high. A Foster scanner modified the signal to cause it to focus on a horizontal location that rapidly scanned back and forth.

This allowed it to comprehensively scan a small “slice” of the sky. The operator would watch for mortar bombs to pass through the slice, locating its range with pulse timing, its horizontal location by the location of the Foster scanner at that instant, and its vertical location from the known angle of the thin beam.

The operator would then flick the antenna to a second angle facing higher into the air, and wait for the signal to appear there. This produced the necessary two points that could be processed by an analogue computer.

However, once phased array radars compact enough for field use and with reasonable digital computing power appeared they offered a better solution. They can detect and track anything in their field of view, providing they lcr sufficient computing power. They can filter out the targets of no interest e. Counter-battery radars used to be mostly X band because this offers the greatest raear for the small radar targets. However, in the radars produced today, C band and S band are common.

The Ku band has also been used. Projectile detection ranges are governed by the radar cross section RCS of the projectiles. Of course, the trajectory has to be high enough to be seen by the lckr at these ranges, and since the raxar locating results for guns and rockets are achieved with a reasonable length of trajectory segment close to the gun, long range detection does not guarantee good locating results. Modern radars typically give CEPs around 0.

However, with these figures long range accuracy may be insufficient to satisfy the Rules of Engagement for counter-battery fire in counter insurgency operations.


Radars typically have a crew of 4—8 soldiers, although only one is needed to actually operate the radar. Older types were mostly trailer mounted with a separate generator, so took 15—30 minutes to bring into action and need a larger crew. However, self-propelled ones have been used since the s. To produce accurate locations radars have to know their own precise coordinates and be precisely oriented.

Until about this relied on conventional artillery survey, although gyroscopic orientation from the mids helped. Radars can detect projectiles at considerable distances, and larger projectiles give stronger reflected signals RCS.

Detection ranges depend on capturing at least several seconds of a trajectory and can be limited by the radar horizon and the height of the trajectory. For non-parabolic trajectories, it is also important to capture a trajectory as close as possible to its source in order to obtain the necessary accuracy. Action on locating hostile artillery depends on policy and circumstances.

In some armies, radars may have authority to send target details to counter-battery fire units and order them to fire, in others they may merely report data to an HQ that then takes action.

Modern radars usually record the target as well as the firing position of hostile artillery. However, this is usually for intelligence purposes because there is seldom time to alert the target with sufficient warning time in a battlefield environment, even with data communications. However, there are exceptions. Similar situation for the new GA10 Ground Alerter 10 [5] radar qualified and successfully deployed by the French land forces in several different FOBs worldwide. The consequences of this detection are likely to be attack by artillery fire or aircraft including anti-radiation missiles or electronic countermeasures.

The usual measures against detection are using a radar horizon to screen from ground-based detection, minimising transmission time and using alerting arrangements lcrm tell the radar when hostile artillery is active. Deploying radars singly and moving frequently reduces exposure to attack. However, in low-threat environments, such as the Balkans in the s, rqdar may transmit continuously and deploy in clusters to provide all-around surveillance.

In other circumstances, particularly counter-insurgency, where ground attack with direct fire or short range indirect fire is the main threat, rada deploy in defended localities but do not need to move, unless they need to cover a different area.

Counter-battery radars operate at microwave frequencies with relatively high average energy consumption up to the tens of kilowatts.

The area immediately forward of the radar array for high energy radars is dangerous to human health. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.

AN/TPQ Lightweight Counter Mortar Radar (LCMR)

Learn how and when to remove these template messages. This article includes a list of referencesbut its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations.

Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. February Learn how and when to remove this template message.

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. May Learn how and when to remove this template message.

Retrieved 1 July eadar Retrieved radad October radr Retrieved from ” https: CS1 French-language sources fr Articles lacking in-text citations from February All articles lacking in-text citations Articles needing additional references from May All articles needing additional references Articles with multiple maintenance issues.

Views Read Edit View history. This page was last edited on 25 Octoberat By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.